Syntax for PAST Optimizations

Patrick R. Michaud pmichaud at
Tue Jun 1 15:55:25 UTC 2010

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:58:59AM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> Even so, getting the optimization language ideal (or at least, correct) is 
> beyond what I expect from Tyler as part of his project.  If his design works 
> out well, we can modify that language as necessary; it's just matching nodes 
> and branches.

I totally agree about the project scope -- I'm more interested in seeing what's
possible in the design as opposed to spending a lot of time on syntax.
My point is just that there needs to be *some* syntax that goes beyond
what PIR provides.


More information about the parrot-dev mailing list