Syntax for PAST Optimizations
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Tue Jun 1 15:55:25 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:58:59AM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> Even so, getting the optimization language ideal (or at least, correct) is
> beyond what I expect from Tyler as part of his project. If his design works
> out well, we can modify that language as necessary; it's just matching nodes
> and branches.
I totally agree about the project scope -- I'm more interested in seeing what's
possible in the design as opposed to spending a lot of time on syntax.
My point is just that there needs to be *some* syntax that goes beyond
what PIR provides.
More information about the parrot-dev