ns_func_cleanup branch, notes
Patrick R. Michaud
pmichaud at pobox.com
Thu Jun 3 23:28:43 UTC 2010
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:09:15PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> >Several other tickets are referenced in TODO notes in this file, some
> >of which are very cryptic. I would like to get some eyes on TT #1219,
> >#1220, #1221, #1222, #1223, #1224, and #1225. I'll fix any and all of
> >these tickets if I can get some clarification on what is needed. If
> >these tickets turn out to be bogus (and some are so old, I don't doubt
> >that they will), we can close them.
> I would propose a simple, two-part rule of thumb: If you,
> whiteknight, don't understand the point of the ticket, and if no one
> else speaks up for it in 24 hours, then, delete the offending
> comment and reject the ticket.
+1, with a possible modification: If the originator of the ticket
(or one of its comments) is a currently active contributor to Parrot,
then maybe wait a bit longer than 24 hours before rejecting the
ticket (or perhaps assign the ticket to that person, or otherwise
check with the contributor before closing it).
More information about the parrot-dev