Undocumented C functions
mike.hind at gmail.com
Sat Jun 26 18:24:09 UTC 2010
looks good to me, can't see anything glaringly obvious wrong.
If it passes the tests commit it. It is not as though it will break
anything (famous last words).
Cheers, Michael (mikehh)
On 26 June 2010 16:14, James E Keenan <jkeen at verizon.net> wrote:
> James E Keenan wrote:
>> Status of efforts in cfunctionsdocs branch:
> 1. Deleted two files and some related code per comments from Andy
> 2. Made what I thought were reasonable POD corrections to
> 3. Provided at least minimal documentation for remaining C functions.
> Can we get some eyeballs on the attached patch? If it's satisfactory (with
> or without content modifications), then I can merge the cfunctionsdocs into
> trunk. From that point forward, any failures in
> t/codingstd/c_function_docs.t will represent new C functions added to the
> repository without documentation.
> Thank you very much.
Michael H. Hind
Cell: +44 (0) 7877 224 745
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the parrot-dev