whiteknight/imcc_compreg_pmc branch

[Peter Lobsinger]

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not seeing that failure on my machine. Can you send me a copy of
> the failure report?
>
> --Andrew Whitworth
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Peter Lobsinger <plobsing at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm still seeing errors on t/examples/pod.t.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've fixed several problems in this branch (with help from plobsing++
>>> and others). I would like to get as much help testing and exercising
>>> this branch as possible. Problematic architectures (I'm looking at
>>> your low-mem box for this, kid51!) and various HLLs. I would like to
>>> try to get this merged in before 3.3, but if there are problems
>>> obviously we will hold off on that.
>>>
>>> This branch should not bring any appreciable changes in performance or
>>> memory usage. If you see something that looks like a huge slowdown or
>>> a significant jump in memory consumption, that's a bug.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --Andrew Whitworth
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>>>
>>
>

#   Failed test 'docs/book/pir/ch04_variables.pod:1313:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for
'iter_repeat'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/Nau35yumhM.pir' line 3
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/pdds/pdd20_lexical_vars.pod:130:PIR:'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:Undefined :outer sub 'foo'.
#
# 	in file '/tmp/da4QNGVL_r.pir' line 4
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod:531:PIR:'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:'bar' is not a vtable, but was used with :vtable.
#
# 	in file '/tmp/MIGc7RjAUo.pir' line 4
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/book/pir/ch03_basic_syntax.pod:265:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for 'GREET'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/YUUOOayMtf.pir' line 3
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/book/pir/ch09_exceptions.pod:294:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for 'my_handler'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/ZthCl68WN2.pir' line 6
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/book/pir/ch09_exceptions.pod:332:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit:invalid type for annotation value
#
# 	in file '/tmp/0fSnOqabM_.pir' line 5
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/compiler_faq.pod:237:PIR:'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for 'got_arg1'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/Vj24ywkd2M.pir' line 10
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/compiler_faq.pod:600:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for 'handler'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/Z6SKjfNKPX.pir' line 6
# '
#     expected: ''

#   Failed test 'docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod:429:PIR:FRAGMENT'
#   at t/examples/pod.t line 79.
#          got: 'error:imcc:e_pbc_emit: no label offset defined for 'iter_end'
#
# 	in file '/tmp/uaEVaTO4uM.pir' line 3
# '
#     expected: ''
# Looks like you failed 9 tests of 634.
t/examples/pod.t ..
Dubious, test returned 9 (wstat 2304, 0x900)
Failed 10/634 subtests

Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/examples/pod.t (Wstat: 2304 Tests: 633 Failed: 9)
  Failed tests:  175, 195, 356, 478, 505, 507, 565, 587
                620
  Non-zero exit status: 9
  Parse errors: Tests out of sequence.  Found (355) but expected (354)
                Tests out of sequence.  Found (356) but expected (355)
                Tests out of sequence.  Found (357) but expected (356)
                Tests out of sequence.  Found (358) but expected (357)
                Tests out of sequence.  Found (359) but expected (358)
Displayed the first 5 of 281 TAP syntax errors.
Re-run prove with the -p option to see them all.
Files=1, Tests=633, 32 wallclock secs ( 0.51 usr  0.04 sys + 15.34
cusr 12.44 csys = 28.33 CPU)
Result: FAIL