PDS Aftermath. Which way NQP?

[Will Coleda]

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, chromatic <chromatic at wgz.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 at 03:05, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
>
>> Strong -1 from me. "Parrot" developers doesn't have resources to
>> maintain own very-similar-but-slightly-different version of NQP.
>
> I did a bit of research on RPython, but it's not standardized either. Are
> there any other small languages suitable for writing compilers? The relevant
> criteria are:
>
>        * a published standard
>        * more pleasant to write than PIR
>        * a history of productive use
>
> -- c
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>

Tcl? Lua? Scheme?

-- 
Will "Coke" Coleda