PDS aftermath: .nqp programs in Parrot core

[Will Coleda]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, chromatic <chromatic at wgz.org> wrote:
> On Monday 31 January 2011 at 08:32, Christoph  wrote:
>
>> I don't agree with
>> the philosophy that choosing a non-modular design to facilitate vendor-
>> lockin is ok as long as it's the 'good guys' who do it;
>
> No one is seriously suggesting Parrot adopt a deliberate strategy to *thwart*
> cross-VM portability.
>
> Some of us question the cost and value of deliberately expanding Parrot's
> scope to *promote* cross-VM portability.

Speaking of strawmen, I'm sorry, who is suggesting that, exactly? I
see a roadmap from NQP folks for NQP to support that, not that we
change parrot to provide that.

> Please, everyone, do keep this important distinction in mind.
>
> -- c
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>



-- 
Will "Coke" Coleda