[members] proposed wording for SFC ballot

Jonathan "Duke" Leto jonathan at leto.net
Sat Jun 1 20:03:44 UTC 2013


This wording looks grea.

It seems that we need some explanation of why parrot-members would
want to vote one way or the other. I can help describe why we would
want to continue to migrate to SFC. Could somebody else explain the
benefits of staying at TPF?


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Allison Randal <allison at parrot.org> wrote:
> Here is some proposed wording for the follow-up membership vote on
> Software Freedom Conservancy. I'll leave it open for comments before
> turning it into a ballot.
> ----------
> Following the closure of the Parrot Foundation, and (re)establishment of
> Parrot under the umbrella of the Perl Foundation, the Parrot Membership
> expresses the wish that future members of the Parrot project:
> [ ] WILL pursue relocation to the Software Freedom Conservancy
> [ ] will NOT pursue relocation to the Software Freedom Conservancy
> [ ] Abstain
> ----------
> Thanks,
> Allison
> _______________________________________________
> members mailing list
> members at parrot.org
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-members

Jonathan "Duke" Leto <jonathan at leto.net>
Leto Labs LLC http://letolabs.com
209.691.DUKE http://duke.leto.net

More information about the parrot-members mailing list