version numbers

[Jerome Quelin]

On 09/02/01 12:37 +0000, kjstol wrote:
> <francois.perrad at gadz.org>wrote:
> > I think we forget that we use a three part version.
> 
> No. On the Parrot Developer Summit the decision was made to use a
> major.minor versioning system, as explained in
> http://www.parrot.org/news/vision-for-1_0

then it won't work for 2.5
january  2.0
february 2.1
march    2.2
april    2.3
may      2.4
june     2.5
july <-- error, 2.5 already released!

1.5 is alright, since 1.0 is in march.

regards,
jérôme 
-- 
jquelin at gmail.com