[perl #45601] [RFC] Plans and notes for the unified testing branch
Will Coleda via RT
parrotbug-followup at parrotcode.org
Tue Feb 10 04:08:35 UTC 2009
On Mon Dec 08 14:06:57 2008, coke wrote:
> On Tue Nov 27 17:01:27 2007, scratchcomputing at gmail.com wrote:
> > # from Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT
> > # on Tuesday 27 November 2007 16:22:
> >
> > >after the release of Test::Harness 3.03 I'm wondering about the
> status
> > >of the 'unified_testing' branch.
> >
> > Test::Harness::Straps doesn't exist in the new Test::Harness, so
> trunk
> > would need to catchup with that issue regardless (e.g. calling
> > Test::Harness::runtests() will no longer pickup on your custom
> straps
> > package.)
> >
> > >I wonder whether any major obstacles have surfaced and whether it
> > > makes sense to merge the changes in 'unified_testing' with 'trunk'
> > > again.
> >
> > As far as the harness is concerned, yes. Using the TAP::Harness API
> is
> > preferable.
> >
> > If the parrot-land changes aren't 100% (e.g. unifying the way in
> which
> > tests expect to be called), the old harness will still need to deal
> > with the fact that the Test::Harness internals have changed and
> Straps
> > is no longer available through that API.
> >
> > --Eric
> >
>
> Can we get a update on this over at
> https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/BranchDescriptions ?
>
> (And then close out this ticket?)
This work is either completed, or the branch is old enough to need some major care and
feeding.
Resolving ticket, and deleting branch (which hasn't been comitted to in 15 months.)
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
More information about the parrot-dev
mailing list