The Core Problem with Parrot Version Numbers

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:33:52PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Alternately, we could use code names to refer to the biannuals, 
> which appeals to my sense of whimsy:
> 
> 	Parrot 1.0 is Parrot Budgie
> 	March 2009: 	Budgie 1
> 			Budgie 2
> 			Budgie 3
> 			Budgie 4
> 	July 2009	Cockatoo 1
> 			Cockatoo 2
> [...]

I like this scheme a lot.  Regardless of what Parrot does,
I'm now seriously considering a version of this approach for Rakudo.
(I had already been thinking along the lines of A, B, C, D, ... 
based names, but having the numeric monthly suffix is a big help.)

Pm