The Core Problem with Parrot Version Numbers

[Geoffrey Broadwell]

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:12 -0800, Mark Glines wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
> > 	March 2009: 	Budgie 1
> > 				Budgie 2
> > 	July 2009		Cockatoo 1
> > 	January 2010	Dusky 1
> 
> +1.  Though I don't have a problem with 20090417 either.  Both of those
> make more sense to me than X.Y.Z does.

I disagree, and I've never liked the word naming scheme (I guess I have
failure to whimsy) -- though I admit that the monthly numbers are a nice
addition that makes the word scheme suck less.  However, I've said my
peace.

-0


-'f