Brave new (1.0) world.

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:29:02PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Allison and I talked about that.  It seems to me that we might as well put 
> likely removal dates (in terms of "GONE BY AUGUST 2009") in our deprecation 
> notices for the sake of clarity anyway, so we might as well keep our numbering 
> scheme very boring and very predictable.

I'd prefer "GONE AFTER AUGUST 2009" to "GONE BY AUGUST 2009".
Normally "deprecation" indicates we plan to remove something 
after a certain date (or "not before" a certain date).

But yes, +1 from me on the overall plan.

Pm