How to say "provides foo" in PIR?

[Will Coleda]

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Will Coleda <will at coleda.com> wrote:
>> Ah, thank you.
>>
>> My first joking response was going to be: "That's far too simple,
>> it'll never work. ;)"; I apparently jinxed myself.
>>
>> I tested it and it doesn't seem to work; the override isn't invoked;
>> This prints out '0' and nothing else. (using does_pmc instead has the
>> same non-effect).
>
> The VTABLE_does in src/pmc/class.pmc currently doesn't look for a PIR
> override. Instead it dispatches the request directly to the associated
> class object.
>
> Do we want this to be overridable from PIR? If so, I'll throw together
> a fix to call the PIR override if available, and fall back to current
> semanics otherwise.
>
> --Andrew Whitworth
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>

Yes please. This is blocking development in  partcl.

-- 
Will "Coke" Coleda