Parrot "standard libraries"

[Timothy S. Nelson]

On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, James E Keenan wrote:

> 1.  Discussion of the benefits of adding any particular library to our 
> "standard set" should also include any disadvantages or risks that that 
> addition may pose.  Potential downsides would include:  More complexity in 
> configuration?  Slows down the executables?  Bigger memory footprint?

 	Hmm.  Have we also considered Larry's reasons for including as little 
as possible[*] in the Perl6 standard libraries?  Not that I'm saying we have 
to go with this, just that it might be a thought.

[*] FSVO "little" and "possible"

 	:)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Name: Tim Nelson                 | Because the Creator is,        |
| E-mail: wayland at wayland.id.au    | I am                           |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V- 
PE(+) Y+>++ PGP->+++ R(+) !tv b++ DI++++ D G+ e++>++++ h! y-
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----