Trig functions

[Andrew Whitworth]

I'm not against creating ops like this, but I would suggest instead
creating them as dynops. In fact, I would be happy to see all the trig
and hyperbolic trig ops moved to dynops, if they aren't already.

--Andrew Whitworth



On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Peter Lobsinger <plobsing at gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 to adding such features to core without any prior demand from users
> (none that I've heard anyways).
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
> <paul at windfall.com> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> We have a full compliment of trig, inverse trig, and hyperbolic operations,
>> except for:
>>
>> acot
>> coth
>> acsc
>> csch
>>
>> We are also missing the inverse hyperbolic operations:
>>
>> asinh
>> acosh
>> atanh
>> acoth
>> asech
>> acsch
>>
>> Should we provide any of these? If so, what about the ones that are complex
>> over some range of arguments?
>>
>> ~~ Paul
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Windfall               Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
>>       ----------------------------------------------------------
>>    Software              978 371-2316
>>                              www.windfall.com
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Metaphorical invocations ... often suffer from the
>> weakness of giving such satisfaction to the human
>> mind that they tend to be mistaken for incisive and
>> illuminating observations. ---Torkel Franzen
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
>