Trig functions

[James E Keenan]

Paul C. Anagnostopoulos wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a full compliment of trig, inverse trig, and hyperbolic operations, except for:
>
> acot
> coth
> acsc
> csch
>
> We are also missing the inverse hyperbolic operations:
>
> asinh
> acosh
> atanh
> acoth
> asech
> acsch
>
> Should we provide any of these? If so, what about the ones that are complex over some range of arguments?


This issue has come up before, see, e.g., 
http://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/943.

I think Allison's recommendation was: dynops.

Thank you very much.
kid51